Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Immigration case a victory

Even the most virulent protester against illegal immigration can't have people like Mariano Cardoso Jr. in mind.
The student at a Hartford community college was brought into this country illegally before he was 2 years old. He has never lived anyplace else. He has no history of arrests, nothing to indicate he is anything other than a hard-working Connecticut resident trying to make a better life for himself.
For that, he faced deportation.
Thanks to supporters across the state and public officials' intervention, Cardoso has been granted a stay of deportation and will likely be able to stay in this country indefinitely.
It is a victory for Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Gov. Dannel Malloy, who championed his cause and convinced federal immigration authorities that, in this case, nothing is to be gained by punishing people for decisions they did not play a role in making.
Under legislation known as the DREAM Act, this outcome would be common. The bill would allow people illegally brought to this country as children and who have followed the rules to stay and work toward citizenship. It was close to becoming law last year, but was blocked in the U.S. Senate.
There's no good reason why. Passing such a law would not reward law-breaking, it would reward people who contribute positively to society. And it would indicate we don't believe in punishing people for the decisions of the parents.
No matter the specifics of the case, there will be those who are unconvinced -- people who believe that someone like Mariano Cardoso is "stealing" from law-abiding citizens. It's wrong and offensive.
This is a case of someone caught up in circumstances beyond his control. And it's a good reminder that illegal immigrants are people, too.


Read more: http://www.ctpost.com/default/article/Immigration-case-a-victory-1355288.php#ixzz1KnRY9cl7

Immigration case a victory

Even the most virulent protester against illegal immigration can't have people like Mariano Cardoso Jr. in mind.
The student at a Hartford community college was brought into this country illegally before he was 2 years old. He has never lived anyplace else. He has no history of arrests, nothing to indicate he is anything other than a hard-working Connecticut resident trying to make a better life for himself.
For that, he faced deportation.
Thanks to supporters across the state and public officials' intervention, Cardoso has been granted a stay of deportation and will likely be able to stay in this country indefinitely.
It is a victory for Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Gov. Dannel Malloy, who championed his cause and convinced federal immigration authorities that, in this case, nothing is to be gained by punishing people for decisions they did not play a role in making.
Under legislation known as the DREAM Act, this outcome would be common. The bill would allow people illegally brought to this country as children and who have followed the rules to stay and work toward citizenship. It was close to becoming law last year, but was blocked in the U.S. Senate.
There's no good reason why. Passing such a law would not reward law-breaking, it would reward people who contribute positively to society. And it would indicate we don't believe in punishing people for the decisions of the parents.
No matter the specifics of the case, there will be those who are unconvinced -- people who believe that someone like Mariano Cardoso is "stealing" from law-abiding citizens. It's wrong and offensive.
This is a case of someone caught up in circumstances beyond his control. And it's a good reminder that illegal immigrants are people, too.


Read more: http://www.ctpost.com/default/article/Immigration-case-a-victory-1355288.php#ixzz1KnRY9cl7

Eight counties to benefit from ICE program - ObserverToday.com | News, Sports, Jobs, Community Information - Dunkirk | The Observer

Eight counties to benefit from ICE program - ObserverToday.com News, Sports, Jobs, Community Information - Dunkirk The Observer

Immigration debate ramps up as students take over Senate president's office

Immigration debate ramps up as students take over Senate president's office

Obama: States Cannot Have Their Own Immigration Laws

AP
President Obama says the U.S. cannot deal with immigration in a piecemeal, state-by-state manner.
President Obama says it would be chaotic for states to create their own immigration policies, and said his administration has been forceful in enforcing immigration laws.
In an interview with WSB-TV, which is based in Georgia, Obama assailed that state’s new immigration law, which treats being in the country illegally as a crime and allows police to act as quasi-immigration agents.
The Georgia Legislature recently passed the measure, which awaits the signature of Gov. Nathan Deal, Republican, who has said he plans to approve it.
"It is a mistake for states to try to do this piecemeal,” Obama said. “We can't have 50 different immigration laws around the country. Arizona tried this and a federal court already struck them down."
“The truth of the matter is that we've done more on enforcement than any previous administration,” the president said. “We have more border patrols. We have been engaging in serious crackdowns on employers who are hiring undocumented workers.”
Hundreds of immigration bills have been introduced in state legislatures this year as local officials express frustration with the failure of Congress to agree on a measure that would reform the nation’s immigration system. 
Some state officials complain that undocumented immigrants are a drain on their resources, and that federal inaction on immigration has forced them to take the matter into their own hands.
But while people on opposite sides of the immigration issue generally agree that the immigration system – in its current form – is broken, they disagree markedly on how to fix it.
Proponents of strict immigration enforcement want the government to take an approach that makes life more difficult for people living in the country illegally, and they want more of an effort made on enforcing laws that already exists. 
Those who want more lenient immigration policies say that the nation never will be able to deport the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants who live in the United States, and that any attempt at immigration reform must include a path to legalization for certain people who meet a strict set of criteria.
Last year, Arizona passed a strict immigration law that re-ignited the debate about undocumented immigrants and states’ roles in dealing with them. Parts of Arizona’s law, however, have been blocked by courts from going into effect.
The Georgia bill would allow law enforcement to check the status of people being investigated, even during a traffic stop, if they don't have an acceptable form of identification. The measure also would require employers to use a federal database to make sure new hires are in the country legally.
The bill's sponsor, state Rep. Matt Ramsey, R-Peachtree City, has said undocumented immigrants are a drain on the state's resources. He and law enforcement officials dismissed fears of profiling.
"We've got to have probable cause to make a stop, probable cause that a criminal or traffic offense has occurred, and probable cause is based on probable cause, not the color of one's skin," said Terry Norris, executive director of the Georgia Sheriff's Association.
He said some amount of instruction will likely be necessary for officers in the course of ongoing training.
Meanwhile, farmers and others are worried about using the free federal database, E-Verify, to make sure new hires are in the U.S. legally. By July 1, 2013, all companies with more than 10 workers will have to use the system.
In Indiana, Republicans and Democrats from the House and Senate met Tuesday to talk about the differing versions of the immigration bills that cleared the two GOP-controlled chambers.
The state senator who wanted Indiana to impose an Arizona-style crackdown on illegal immigration says the proposal has faced much incorrect information on how it would be enforced.
Bill sponsor Republican Sen. Mike Delph of Carmel says he hopes a compromise can be worked out before the legislature's Friday adjournment deadline.
The House watered down the Senate-approved bill by removing provisions letting police officers ask people for proof that they are in the country legally.
Republican Rep. Bill Davis of Portland says many Indiana businesses hire workers from throughout the world and it's important to make sure those people aren't wrongly inconvenienced.
This story contains material from The Associated Press

Thursday, April 21, 2011

8 NY counties join immigration fingerprint program

BUFFALO, N.Y. — Federal immigration authorities have signed on eight more New York counties to the Secure Communities program.
The 2½-year-old program red flags potential criminal illegal immigrants by running the fingerprints of people arrested by state or local authorities against federal government databases.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials say Thursday that Chautauqua, Niagara, Livingston, Ontario, Otsego, Seneca, Steuben and Yates counties are now part of the program.
From now on, when someone's booked there for a crime, their fingerprints will be sent not only to the Justice Department to check for criminal history, but to Homeland Security's biometric system to check against immigration law enforcement records.
There are now 22 counties in New York using Secure Communities and 1,211 jurisdictions in 41 states. The goal is for complete coverage by 2013.
—Copyright 2011 Associated Press

Obama denies blame on immigration reform | Hayley Peterson | Politics | Washington Examiner

Obama denies blame on immigration reform Hayley Peterson Politics Washington Examiner

Monday, April 18, 2011

9&10 News - Immigration summit..."Birther bill" vetoed...Taco Bell suit dropped

9&10 News - Immigration summit..."Birther bill" vetoed...Taco Bell suit dropped

Crowd calls for reforms at ICE

Hundreds gather in Dearborn for immigration rally

Mark Hicks / The Detroit News

Dearborn — Metro Detroit was front and center Monday in the immigration debate as an Illinois lawmaker brought his national tour to town to highlight deportations and the need for reform.
"The system just isn't working, and we need to change it now," Rep. Luis Gutierrez said to cheers at the UAW Local 600.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Gutierrez is petitioning President Barack Obama to back more relief to immigrants and fight for the federal DREAM Act, a proposal to give illegal immigrant students a pathway to citizenship through college or military service.
The issue has grown in places like Detroit, where Hispanics have complained about tactics by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials they call aggressive.
They say agents are engaging in "racial profiling" and point to several recent incidents, including on March 31 when ICE agents allegedly stalked Hispanic immigrants as they dropped their children off at school.
"We contribute by working hard," said Ruben Torres, 45, a Detroit Public Schools engineer and American citizen who was stopped by an unmarked agent last month. "To be treated like this — it's not good."
Hundreds cheered calls for reform from state Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat who represents southwest Detroit; and U.S. Reps. Hansen Clarke and John Conyers. Leaders asked the public to step forward with their stories of encounters with ICE to spotlight abuse or civil rights violations.
"Our community is tired of living in fear," said Angela Reyes, a community activist and executive director and founder of the Detroit Hispanic Development Corp. "This is not law enforcement, this is intimidation."
Last week, ICE Director John Morton met with local immigration reform activists and community leaders.
He promised to review the agency's enforcement policies.
Meanwhile, the White House said Obama was scheduled to meet today at the White House with a bipartisan group to discuss revamping the nation's immigration system.
Local activists say they want policies that make it more difficult for officials to target working, law-abiding immigrants.


From The Detroit News: http://detnews.com/article/20110419/METRO/104190365/Crowd-calls-for-reforms-at-ICE#ixzz1Jwd9dZoW

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer Vetoes Birther Bill

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer Vetoes Birther Bill

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Court to Obama: Just ignore Congress (OneNewsNow.com)

Court to Obama: Just ignore Congress (OneNewsNow.com)

Georgia set to pass Arizona-style immigration law

TODAY'S TAKE
The last order of business for the Georgia General Assembly in its 40-day legislative session is also one of the most controversial: an Arizona-like proposal to penalize illegal immigrants.

Like the Arizona measure approved amid much debate last year, Georgia House Bill 87 would allow local police to check the immigration status of anyone whose legality it suspects. Supporters say it is necessary to take on an illegal immigration problem that the federal government has failed to address. Critics believe the state should not and legally cannot enforce immigration policy, and that the proposal would have negative consequences on Georgia's huge agricultural industry, which relies on migrant farm labor.

Both sides of the debate believe some form of the measure will pass. But there are still several disagreements to be worked out,
according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. One involves a provision that would require Georgia businesses to check the immigration status of their employees using a federal system known as E-Verify. Underscoring the complexity of the negotiations, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal a Republican who campaigned last year on the need to address illegal immigration has not taken a position on the bill, The Journal-Constitution notes.

In general, Arizona-like immigration crackdown bills have fared poorly this year in legislatures amid political and fiscal concerns, such as the possibility that the measures will prompt economic boycotts, as the Arizona law did. Meanwhile, the Arizona law faces an uncertain future amid court challenges, and many states are watching to see how that legislation fares legally before moving forward on their own proposals.

Besides Georgia, other states that could pass immigration crackdowns this year include Alabama and Florida.

“Today’s Take” provides a quick analysis of the day’s top news in state government.


Texas House panel takes up immigration bills

Click here to find out more!

The Texas Legislature is trying again to push forward legislation targeting illegal immigration.
A House committee on Wednesday evening heard a slew of Republican-backed bills, including one that would fine or put behind bars people who knowingly hire illegal immigrants. All of the bills were left pending in the committee.
A bill by Rep. Debbie Riddle, R-Houston, raised questions because it initially exempted people who hired illegal immigrants as domestic help. However, Riddle removed that clause from her bill, leaving only those who attempt to verify the citizenship status of their employees as exempt from the state felony charges.
"This is a very low hurdle to clear with a high penalty if you don't make any effort to do so," Riddle said.
Even after the clause was removed, opposition to Riddle's bill was fierce.
Critics say the measure would increase discrimination against lawful workers who may look foreign and would only splinter an already-fragmented immigration system. Immigration attorneys warned that federal immigration law pre-empts state law in this area and that inconsistent enforcement would be unavoidable.
"It is not within your power to solve this tremendously complex problem," Robert Loughran, an immigration attorney at FosterQuan, LLP, told the committee. "This remains a federally-defined issue with plenty of case law to back that up. Absent a comprehensive solution to this problem across the United States, we are not solving the problem."
Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, portrayed his bill that would make English the official language of Texas as a cost-saving measure.
Berman claimed the measure would save the state millions because it would then print things only in English. The state comptroller's office did not produce a fiscal note on the bill, and opponents were skeptical that the bill was primarily about saving money.
Representatives from the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund argued that the legislation isn't about cost-savings but is targeting immigrants, many of whom don't speak English.
"It's clear that the real intent is to send the message that English is the official language of Texas," said Luis Figuera, staff attorney with the organization. He added that today's immigrant population is learning English faster than previous generations.
The state should be more concerned with helping immigrants learn English instead, he said.
Several bills seek to require employers to enroll in the federal employment verification system, E-Verify. Employers can use the voluntary online program to determine a worker's citizenship status
Supporters say Texas employers should be required to use the program, but opponents say the error rate is too high and the program doesn't actually detect a large percentage of unauthorized workers. They say E-Verify is limited in its nature and can't detect stolen identities.
"There is no way to fix this without the federal government," said Norman Adams, co-founder of Texans for Sensible Immigration Policy. "We are attacking the economic machines that run this state and employ our people, and that's the last thing we need to be doing. We don't need any of these E-Verify bills."
One thing both sides agreed on was that the federal government has failed to implement effective immigration law. A resolution by Rep. John Garza, R-San Antonio, urging Congress to overhaul the immigration system got widespread support from witnesses and members on the committee.
"I want to thank you for bringing the best piece of legislation I've seen come through this committee this session," Rep. Charlie Geren, R-River Oaks, said.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Man recruited fake army in immigration scam, prosecutors say

Man recruited fake army in immigration scam, prosecutors say

Meg Whitman says the GOP must change its approach on immigration

Former Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman said Tuesday that her party must change its approach on immigration if it wants to be successful in California.

"My view is that the immigration discussion, the rhetoric the Republican Party uses, is not helpful; it's not helpful in a state with the Latino population we have," Whitman said during a brief interview following a speech at a George W. Bush Institute conference on the economy. "We as a party are going to have to make some changes, how we think about immigration, and how we talk about immigration."

In her remarks, among the first made by the former EBay chief since she spent $144 million of her fortune on her campaign loss to Democrat Jerry Brown, Whitman did not offer specific prescriptions.

During the 2010 campaign, Whitman made an unprecedented multimillion-dollar effort to woo Latinos, who made up about one-fifth of the electorate. She aired ads during the soccer World Cup and set up offices in heavily Latino communities such as East Los Angeles.

But the immigration issue dogged her throughout the campaign. Running against a more conservative candidate in the primary, she showcased former Gov. Pete Wilson to establish her credentials among the party's conservative voters. He is viewed as a pariah among some in the Latino community for his vocal support of Proposition 187, a 1994 ballot measure that sought to deny taxpayer-funded services to illegal immigrants.

Later, during a debate with Brown in Fresno, Whitman told a high-achieving undocumented student that she was taking away a spot from a legal resident. And in the month before election day, an illegal immigrant housekeeper who worked for Whitman for nearly a decade emerged, prompting questions of hypocrisy. In a Los Angeles Times/USC poll taken after the election, 71% of Latino voters said they disliked Whitman.

Whitman declined to say whether she felt any specific action in the campaign fatally wounded her.

"It's hard to know," she said. "The campaign went on for a long time, a really long time. It's hard to point to one thing."

She said she had no regrets about her campaign, whose price tag shattered records for overall spending on a non-presidential race — $180 million — as well as for self-funding.

"I was privileged to run and willingly spent 2 1/2 years…running, and obviously I'm sorry that it didn't turn out the way I had hoped," she said.

She said she doubted she would run for elected office again.

"You never say never, but probably not," Whitman said.

While she would have approached the problems in Sacramento "quite differently" than Brown, Whitman declined to criticize her former rival.

"He won and he deserves the chance to be successful. As a Californian, I want him to be successful," she said, in response to a question posed by an audience member after her speech. "What I hate about American politics is no matter who wins, the very next day, everyone's on them trying to tear them down as opposed to lift them out and hope that they can be successful."

Since election day, Whitman has largely stayed out of the public eye.

"I needed to just take a deep breath, reconnect with my husband, sleep in my own bed," she said in the interview.

She vacationed in Hawaii and New Zealand, and spoke at small private events, before reentering corporate life in January. She joined the boards of Hewlett-Packard, Procter & Gamble and Zipcar, and signed on as a part-time strategic advisor to Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a Silicon Valley venture capital firm. She also joined the board of Teach for America, reflecting what she said was a concern about education that sharpened during the campaign.

Her first major public appearance came Tuesday at the Bush conference, which focused on expanding the U.S. gross domestic product by 4% annually. Her half-hour speech hit many of the themes she raised on the campaign trail — tax, tort, regulatory and education reform.

Whitman said she was heartened by moves in Washington that she believes are focusing the nation's attention on fiscal issues, such as Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan's budget proposal that calls for dramatically altering Medicare.

Although she doesn't believe the plan can be implemented in its current form, Whitman said, it is forcing a discussion that is desperately needed.

"I do not think, without Paul Ryan's budget, President Obama would be addressing the nation tomorrow night to talk about the debt and the fiscal situation," she said.

Whitman will be returning to the spotlight soon as an advisor on her former boss Mitt Romney's likely presidential run.

She played a similar role in Romney's 2008 campaign, but she said she will be a better advisor and surrogate this time around because of her recent experience.

"Having done this, I am in the unique position of having been in business and now having been in the political arena for 2 1/2 years, so I think my advice will be more grounded in the realities of a campaign," she said.

Monday, April 11, 2011

Man gets death in Minutemen killing

TUCSON, April 7 (UPI) -- An Arizona jury has given a death sentence to a man who killed a drug dealer and his 9-year-old daughter in a bungled plan to fund an anti-immigrant group.
Jason Bush, 36, is the second person to be sentenced to execution in the case. Shawna Forde was convicted in February of orchestrating the robbery of Raul Junior Flores.
A third defendant is scheduled to go on trial soon.
Jurors decided on the death penalty Wednesday after beginning deliberations Tuesday, the Arizona Daily Star reported.
Investigators said Forde, an anti-immigrant activist who had been asked to leave the Minutemen Civil Defense Corps, decided to rob drug dealers to fund a splinter group, Minutemen American Defense. In 2009, Flores and his daughter Brisenia were killed in an invasion of their home and his wife, Gina Gonzalez, survived by playing dead.
In his closing statement, Bush's lawyer, Richard Parrish, said his client has a long history of mental illness. He also criticized Gonzalez for describing her life as "heaven," given the drugs and weapons in the house.
"They want you to think that the Flores and Gonzalez family simply isn't worth your trouble," Deputy Pima County Attorney Rick Unklesbay said


Justice Department faces Thursday deadline for answering lawsuit over immigration enforcement

PHOENIX — U.S. Justice Department lawyers face a Thursday deadline for filing an answer to Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer's lawsuit that accuses the federal government of failing to control the state's border with Mexico and enforce immigration laws.
The federal government hasn't yet responded to the counter-lawsuit that Brewer filed two months ago as part of the Justice Department's lawsuit that seeks to invalidate the state's immigration enforcement law.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which is in charge of policing the nation's borders, has called Brewer's lawsuit meritless.
Brewer's lawsuit accuses the federal government of sticking the state with huge costs associated with jailing illegal immigrants who commit crimes.
U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton has put the most controversial sections of the enforcement law on hold.
Brewer has appealed that ruling.

Mass immigration damages U.S. culture, economy

Tibetan independence from China is a popular cause in the U.S. Fashionable among actors and musicians, it's outspoken supporters range from Russell Brand to the Red Hot Chili Peppers. "Free Tibet" advocates raise a legitimate concern; that Tibet's unique character will vanish beneath a massive wave of immigrants from China.
"The burgeoning Chinese migrants in Tibet, including many with criminal records," says an Aug. 7, 2010 Tibet Today column, has left Tibet's "cultural values and social stability in jeopardy." Freetibet.org says the movement is dedicated to protecting Tibet's distinct "culture, history and identity" from being "irrevocably eroded."
Tibet isn't the only country facing this problem. For example, indigenous British citizens are expected to become minorities in large cities like Birmingham and Leicester during the 2020s, according to an April 10 article in The Telegraph. However, British natives who object to this, rather than enjoying the support of Sharon Stone or Gorillaz, are labeled as bigots.
We see this same disconnect in America, where census projections show that Americans of European descent will account for a minority of children under 18 in just 15 years, due largely to immigration. Americans who make the same appeals to "culture, history and identity" that we find acceptable from Tibetans are dismissed as hatemongers.
Ironically, many defenders of large-scale immigration empathize with the struggle of American Indians against European settlement. I agree that the losses suffered by American Indians were terrible, but this seems to be an argument against mass immigration, not for it. Writes Comanche activist David Yeagley in an Oct. 15, 2002 column: "America today is making the same mistake we Indians made nearly four centuries ago. America is letting in too many foreigners."
A December 2006 study in the U.S. National Library of Medicine found a correlation between culture loss and suicide. Ethical or not, most humans are healthier and happier when they associate with people similar to themselves. As former Harvard professor Samuel Huntington said, "The persistent inflow of Hispanic immigrants threatens to divide the United States into two peoples, two cultures and two languages." This level of division has lead to violent conflicts around the world.
Mass immigration puts an enormous strain on American taxpayers. Immigrants receive a disproportionately large amount of housing subsidies, food stamps and free medical care. According to a report released this week by the Center for Immigration Studies, 57 percent of immigrant households receive welfare. Specifically, 70 percent of illegal immigrant households receive welfare.
Granting amnesty to 10 million illegal immigrants would add a net cost of $16 billion a year in welfare, according to a June 5, 2006 Human Events column. The problems with America's welfare system are already myriad; a June 25, 2010 article in the LA Times reported that, in 2009, California welfare recipients spent $1.8 million on casino chips.
Assuming current trends continue, America's population will double to 550 million in the next 65 years. If you're a proponent of large-scale immigration, ask yourself: when was the last time you were driving on a highway and wished there were more people on the road?

Senate taking up immigration bill as opposition mounts

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Georgia's Senate is preparing to take up Arizona-style immigration enforcement legislation for a vote Monday afternoon amid threats of economic boycotts and petitions from critics who oppose the measure.
The National Day Laborer Organizing Network faxed a letter to Gov. Nathan Deal Thursday, saying Georgia will face boycotts if it enacts the legislation.
And on Monday, activists presented Deal's office with 23,000 petition signatures urging him to stop the measure. Additionally, the head of the Korean American Association of Greater Atlanta last week sent state lawmakers petitions signed by more than 4,000 Korean Americans from Gwinnett County who are opposed to the legislation.
“The boycott is being organized because the state’s pending Arizona-style racial profiling legislation would undermine fundamental civil rights and civil liberties and pose a special threat to immigrants and people of color who live in and travel through the state of Georgia,” Pablo Alvarado, executive director of the Los Angeles-based National Day Laborer Organizing Network, said in a letter faxed to the governor last week. “We know from our experience in Arizona that these types of laws have devastating effects on families, students, workers, business, and entire communities.”
Deal’s office said Monday that the governor will begin reviewing bills after the session ends this week. It did not address specific legislation.
The Legislature is considering two bills -- Senate Bill 40 and House Bill 87 -- that are partly patterned after tough immigration enforcement legislation Arizona enacted last year. Georgia’s bills would require many businesses to confirm their new hires are eligible to work in the United States. The bills would also penalize people who harbor illegal immigrants and empower police to question certain suspects about their immigration status. HB 87 is scheduled to come up for a Senate floor vote Monday afternoon.
Cities and counties across the nation have targeted Arizona with economic boycotts since that state enacted Senate Bill 1070 last year. Dozens of conventions that had been planned for Arizona have been canceled or relocated amid those boycotts. Meanwhile, proponents of Arizona's legislation have traveled to that state to show their support. Supporters say the states must act because the federal government has failed to seal the nation's borders.

Disasters Reverse Local Japan Recovery, Report Shows

TOKYO—The March 11 disasters appear to have reversed what was looking like a nascent recovery in local Japanese economies, according to a report released Monday.
Most regions in Japan, as expected, downgraded their assessment of local economic conditions in April from three months ago, citing disruption caused by the March 11 earthquake and tsunami, a quarterly report released by the central bank showed Monday.
"Cautious views about the economy have become widespread in many regions, mainly reflecting setbacks in production following the Great East Japan Earthquake," the Bank of Japan's Regional Economic Report for April, also known as the Sakura Report, showed.
Bank of Japan Governor Masaaki Shirakawa added Monday that he expects a return to a moderate recovery path as the supply chain begins to come back, though smaller companies may face continuing problems. Japan's central bank already had downgraded its assessment of the overall economy in its monthly report for April, released last week.
Seven of nine regions reported weakness in output "mainly due to damage to production facilities, supply-chain disruptions, and constraints on the use of electricity caused by the earthquake," the report stated.
In the northern region of Tohoku, whose coastal areas were devastated by the quake and the tsunami that followed, "the economy—which had been picking up until recently—has been damaged significantly, with impairment of the social infrastructure as well as production and business facilities," the report said.
In the neighboring Kanto-Koshinetsu region, which includes the Tokyo metropolitan area, some prefectures are suffering from the effects of the continuing crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
Farming and fishing industries have been hit by shipping bans imposed after radioactive materials were found in some products, and sales even of goods not contaminated by radiation have dropped as consumers shun products from the region altogether.
The Sakura Report—akin to the U.S. Federal Reserve Board's beige book—is based on data gathered by the BOJ's regional research divisions. The report was released at Monday's quarterly meeting of the central bank's branch managers.
In a sign of sluggishness even before the quake, core machinery orders in February were down 2.3% from January, another report showed. The fall in machinery orders, a leading indicator of corporate capital investment, is part of a string of negative signs. Businesses must invest to rebuild destroyed or damaged factories, but plummeting consumer confidence, power outages and concerns surrounding the crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant may drag on capital expenditure, which accounts for around 15% of the economy.
[JECON]
"Demand may not recover smoothly amid strong concerns over power shortages, so there's a high chance that machinery orders and other capex indicators will be in a downtrend for a while," said Takeshi Minami, chief economist at Norinchukin Research Institute. "It may not be until at least the fall that recovery strengthens."
The 2.3% drop was more than double the 1.1% median forecast of economists surveyed by Dow Jones Newswires and the Nikkei, and followed rises of 4.2% in January and 1.7% in December. While manufacturing orders rose 11.1%, nonmanufacturing orders fell 4.5%, and overseas orders plunged 10.1%.
"The market is feeling quite nervous," said Okasan Securities strategist Hideyuki Ishiguro. "If February is this bad, post-quake March will be even more severe."
On Friday, the government reported that the main index from the March "economic watchers" survey—which covers sentiment in the domestic economy, especially the service sector—was at 27.7, a record one-month plunge from February's 48.4, and the lowest since 19.4 hit in February 2009.
The industrial sector also is expected to be hit by power-supply shortages due to the quake and the continuing problems at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. The government has decided to order big businesses to curb electricity use to prevent summer power shortages, which is expected to hit production.
Core orders exclude ships and equipment ordered by electric power companies, which are typically large and can swing from month to month, obscuring the underlying trend.
To temper the economic blow of the disasters and to help reconstruction, the BOJ has offered measures that include a special lending facility—laid out at the end of its policy-board meeting last Thursday—that makes ¥1 trillion ($11.82 billion) of inexpensive funds available for banks in the affected areas

Thursday, April 7, 2011

This bauble of an immigration cap should be sent back home

From yesterday there was a new cap on immigration: this is a longstanding Tory promise. Indeed I thought I remembered it from the televised debates, but what I was actually remembering was Michael Howard's ill-fated, handwritten "My mum wrote a shopping list and then put me a little policy at the bottom" poster campaign, which read: "It's not racist to impose limits on immigration." (Someone defaced this with a simple, "Yes it is, Tory scum!")
If you take the polls and you marry them to any precept of democracy, imposing limits on immigration is exactly what should be done. Three-quarters of British people, according to recent surveys, want to reduce immigration. So it must be reduced, particularly since this public desire is no recent development; in fact it has been simmering for the last 15 years.
However, those figures are more vexed than they look. Indeed, amble around Oxford's Migration Observatory: it's a number-crunching organisation trying to bring some clarity to the issue by presenting readable data, as clean as they can get it – which is "not very". Almost no statistic in migration is without caveat. People may be against migration in theory but that alters with the wording of the question: specifically, it depends how you define "migrants". The public tends to be against illegal migration (which no government can cap, since it all happens informally). Yet other migrants – those staying on after a student visa, those on a working visa who have come to work for the NHS – are pretty popular. Despite this much-mentioned 75% opposition, people don't connect their opposition to the migrants they know personally.
But if those figures are incomplete, that is nothing compared to the patchiness of the data on numbers of migrants themselves: there's such limited information on emigrants that net migration is way off. The three data sources on immigrants never agree with each other.
Local area statistics are so poor that there's a council in Devon that cites 4,000 migrants with a margin of error of 4,000. That's not the fault of this government but it is their reality. The fact is that they do not know enough to make the promises they're making. They know that, but they're relying on the fact that we don't know enough to notice. It would be melodramatic to call the cap a disaster: more accurately, it's a waste of time, a bauble; the sort of thing that one week in power should have persuaded them to abandon.
First, the immigration cap only applies to the inflow of non-European Union residents. And it doesn't so far apply to non-EU student immigrants, or those whose eligibility is based on family ties. It only applies to labour applications, themselves only 20% of the non-EU inflow – which in turn is a drop in the ocean of total inflow. These working visas are estimated to account for 5% of net migration, and that is a generous estimate: some studies put them at 1%. Then there are the exemptions: intercompany transfers are exempt, and those are historically the biggest share of workforce immigration from outside Europe.
OK, let's say they ended all exemptions. Even if they shut down any movement at all from the labour force outside the EU, it wouldn't produce a fall in net migration that would hit even tens of thousands. This cohort is just too small, and capping it changes nothing unless you count the vexation to the people so arbitrarily refused entry and the reassurance to a few Ukip voters who couldn't be arsed to look at the figures.
In order to make any real difference to the figures the government has to go after student entry, which accounts for 60% of non-EU migration. Theresa May claims already to have cut the numbers by 80,000 just by raising the standard of English requirement and axing the two-year post-study period when students would previously have been allowed to work.
Statisticians are sceptical about how these modifications could deliver such a reduction, but even if it were true there would still be big trouble ahead. Non-EU postgraduates pay very high fees: in many universities they're cross-subsidising British undergraduates.
At a lower level non-EU students who come to the UK to learn English contribute a huge amount to the economy, as raised by Brighton Pavilion MP Caroline Lucas last year when she noted that in Brighton and Hove alone, they brought in £105m a year. No impact assessment on student inflow has been sought by the government from the agencies dealing with net migration, presumably because they don't intend to limit student visas. The area is too important to the economy, and the numbers are great. Cap them? You may as well cap tourism.
Where does that leave the coalition in its bold promise to reduce immigration? It could secede from the EU altogether and boot out Europeans; it could rip up the rules on migration for family reasons, which would most likely involve ducking out of all human rights legislation; or it could find more accurate information on immigration to start with. Soon enough it would be clear that "cap it", never mind the similarity of tone, is as nonsensical, meaningless and impracticable as "Send 'em back".

California anti-illegal immigration bills die

A state Legislative committee struck down a pair of bills targeting illegal immigration in California, according to news reports.
Tuesday, the committee rejected Secure Immigration Act – AB26 – and shorter bill AB1018, The Associated Press reported.
Article Tab : A state legislative committee struck down a pair of bills targeting illegal immigration in California.
A state legislative committee struck down a pair of bills targeting illegal immigration in California.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Immigration Text Alerts: Subscribe to free immigration news alerts. About 3-7 are sent each week. Text OCRIMMIG to 56654. More OCRegister news alerts.
ADVERTISEMENT
AB26 would have allowed citizens to launch lawsuits against any local government that operates as a sanctuary for people who are in the country illegally. The bill also would have made it mandatory for every California employer to use E-Verify – a federal Internet-based program that allows employers to check the eligibility of employees to work in the country.
AB1018 would have required all state agencies to use a federal verification program to ensure that the person was eligible for state-funded benefits.
Assemblyman Tim Donnelly, R-Claremont, introduced the bills, which some experts said faced a hard battle in an Assembly dominated by Democrats. The bills were inspired by Arizona's recent anti-illegal immigration law SB1070, according to KPBS.com.
The bill was defeated along party lines in 7-3 vote by the Assembly Judiciary Committee, according to The Associated Press.
Opponents of the bill included committee chairman Assemblyman Mike Feuer, D-Los Angeles, who called the bill "needlessly divisive" and unconstitutional, according to The Associated Press. Some business representatives said it would cost the state jobs while some law enforcement officials said it would make Californians less safe by taking away resources otherwise used to battle more serious crimes.
Donnelly, a tea party member from San Bernardino County, said he would keep trying.
"While I am disappointed that Assembly Bill 26 will not move forward this year, I am greatly encouraged by the incredible show of support the bill received," Donnelly said on Tuesday, according to the Contra Costa Times. "This is not the end of the fight to protect citizens from the many problems caused by illegal immigration in California, and I look forward to continued work on this critical issue. "

Illegal immigrants were charged up to $60,000 for fake marriage papers, authorities allege

Immigration officials have arrested three people in connection with the charging of up to $60,000 to arrange fake marriages for illegal immigrants, authorities said.
In all, 21 suspicious visa petitions were traced back to the business, MPEagle Consultants, which is alleged to have charged $15,000 to $60,000 for its services, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency said.
The three suspects -- all members of one family -- owns an immigration-consulting business that caters primarily to Indian nationals who sought marriage certificates and work visas, according to federal authorities.

Authorities said Ajit Kumar Bhargava, 61; his wife, Nisha Bhargava, 56; and their daughter, Runjhun Bhargava, 30; were arrested on suspicion of immigration fraud charges after being named in a criminal complaint filed in U.S. District Court. They are Yorba Linda residents.

Federal authorities said they launched their investigation in September 2009 after they noticed suspicious similarities among the business' visa applications. In some cases, the same "spouses" and marriage witnesses were used, according to authorities.

Community protests immigration raid on elementary school

became the targets of the federal immigration agents.
As the school was encircled, two families took refuge inside. Two additional families were followed and detained after dropping off children.
At an April 6 press conference to protest the action, Hope principal Ali Abdel said he was outraged by the action. The parents, he said, "are hardworking people, not criminals."
The school became a frightened "ghost town" because of the raid, the principal said. After the afternoon bell, some parents were afraid to pick up their children, he said.
Abdel said the raid has had lasting effects, with some students no longer coming to school, others asking what is going to happen to them and many having trouble focusing on their studies.
"We want this to stop," he declared.
The press conference was held outside the school despite cold rain. Hope of Detroit Academy is located in the largely Latino community of Southwest Detroit.
Speakers laid the blame for the outrageous actions at the feet of the Detroit ICE director, Rebecca Adducci.
Democratic State Rep. Rashida Tlaib, who represents the area, said such actions are becoming a pattern under Adducci, with reports of agents setting up checkpoints and watching schools, churches and supermarkets.
Many speakers pointed out that this is out of compliance with ICE's own internal policies, which say agents should refrain from actions near schools, churches and other sensitive areas. The school adjoins St. Francis D'Assisi Church.
Ryan Bates, director of the Alliance for Immigrant Rights and Reform in Michigan, said that when he got a call about the incident his reaction was, "I didn't believe it. It was so outrageous, so foolish, so cruel."
He said he went straight to the scene and asked ICE agents if they had warrants. Their answer, he said, was, "We don't need a warrant to be on a public street in front of a school."

Told they had terrified students and adults, the agents finally departed. But, principal Abdel reported, "they returned later that day in time for the closing bell."
Two weeks before the surrounding of the school, another horrible incident occurred.
Parent Rogelio Perez told the crowd, "I have three beautiful children, 9, 5 and 3. I was living the American dream. I was working and my children were going to the school."
However everything changed the morning of March 23 after he dropped his kids off at school.
As he pulled up to his home, he saw lights flash. "It was ICE," he said. Although he had done nothing wrong and they had no warrant, they illegally forced their way into his home. The search resulted in the detention of his wife who is six months pregnant. She was imprisoned and denied access to her medication and medical care. She has since been deported to Mexico with her three U.S. citizen children.
Residents here ask: Will the "unthinkable" continue to happen?
Lawrence Garcia, president of the Hispanic Bar Association of Michigan, said the community is demanding a full investigation to determine the persons responsible for authorizing these "out-of-control" actions, censure and some form of punishment for the wrongdoers, and finally reassurance that ICE will stand by internal policies and respect laws like the Fourth Amendment that prohibit warrantless searches and improper targeting of people.
If not addressed within seven days, speakers said, a complaint will be filed with the U.S. Department of Justice.
Photo: Ryan Bates, director of the Alliance for Immigrant Rights and Reform in Michigan, speaks at the April 6 press conference outside Hope of Detroit Academy in Southwest Detroit. Listening behind him are, left to right: State Rep. Rashida Tlaib (holding pad), Hope principal Ali Abdel, State Rep. Harvey Santana, and Hispanic Bar Association of Michigan President Lawrence Garcia. Photo courtesy of Reform Immigration for America - Michigan

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Italy's Troubling Immigration Deal with Gaddafi

The young Eritrean woman was exhausted, famished and dehydrated after spending four days in March lost in the Mediterranean Sea. She had been on a fishing boat with nearly 300 African migrants, crammed so tightly that she couldn't move. But when Helen saw her rescuers, she couldn't help but feel a little worried. The last time she had seen an Italian military ship, things had not gone well.
Twenty years old and six months pregnant, Helen is one of the more than 22,000 people who have arrived in Italy by boat since unrest in Libya and Tunisia lifted restrictions on emigration, even as fighting and fear of economic chaos drove many to flee. She's also part of another group: those who have made the dangerous, difficult journey before, only to be turned back by those they thought would be their saviors. (See exclusive photos of Libya's rebels.)
From May 2009 until the beginning of the chaos in Libya, Italy outsourced its immigration control to Libya's dictator, Muammar Gaddafi. During that time, Italian ships intercepted at least 1,000 people and returned them to Libya. Many of them likely were political refugees whom Rome had an international obligation to accept. Helen's story and those of others interviewed by TIME last week provide a window into a European approach to immigration control, in which some of the world's most vulnerable people were sent back to a brutal dictatorship with the knowledge that they would almost certainly be mistreated.
It was July 2009 when Helen and her fiancé first tried to cross the Mediterranean. (Like other immigrants quoted in this story, she asked to be referred to only by her first name.) The boat the smugglers had herded them onto had gotten lost and run out of gas. The 82 passengers had consumed all their food and water. Their Thuraya satellite phone had exhausted its batteries. "We were ready to die," recalled Helen. And then an Italian ship steamed into view. (See photos of the battle for Libya.)
At first, the migrants — mostly sub-Saharan Africans who had fled their own countries, crossed the Sahara and spent months in terrible conditions in Libya — thought they had made it to safety. They boarded the Italian vessel, accepted the water they were offered and settled in for what they thought would be a short trip. But elation soon turned to despair. Some noticed by the position of the sun that the ship had turned toward Libya. Terrified at the prospect of facing Gaddafi's brutal police, the Africans started screaming at the sailors. And that's when the beatings began.
According to the United Nations Refugee Agency, which documented the case, the passengers on Helen's boat included nine women and at least six children. Many of them would have qualified for some sort of international protection. Though the boat had been at sea for four days, the migrants weren't offered any food. According to Human Rights Watch, which also researched the event, the Italian sailors used clubs and cattle prods to force the migrants off their ship onto a Libyan boat.
Helen, who had never been detained before, was frightened by the thought of being handed over to the Libyans. "I spent all my time crying," she said. "They beat us all the way to prison." In Libya, the women were separated from the men and delivered to a notoriously dirty and overcrowded migrant-detention center in al-Zawiyah, a town southwest of Tripoli. According to Helen, about 100 people shared two toilets — holes in the ground with salt-water taps — one of which was often closed. Some of the detainees had children with them. Others were pregnant. Food was rice or pasta in a light broth, "only something to put in your mouth to stay alive," said Helen. And the beatings were constant. "The Libyans never see a black person as human," said Helen. "They don't see you as a person who might be hungry, who might be thirsty, who might get tired." (Watch TIME's video "Libyan Rebels Have Passion, Lack Order.")


Read more: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2063399,00.html#ixzz1Ihfm92L4

Alabama House passes Arizona-style immigration law

MONTGOMERY, Alabama -- The House of Representatives voted 73-28 this evening to pass an Arizona-style immigration law that gives law enforcement officers authority to detain people they suspect of being illegal immigrants.
 
  Bill sponsor Rep. Micky Hammon, R-Decatur, told legislators that the bill, "attacks every aspect of an illegal alien's life."
 
  "This bill is designed to make it difficult for them to live here so they will deport themselves," Hammon said during debate. The bill now goes to the Senate.
 
  Hammon said illegal immigrants in Alabama are costing taxpayers money and taking jobs from American citizens. But critics of the bill said it would encourage racial profiling and add to law enforcement costs, and they argued that immigration enforcement should be the job of the federal government.
 
  Hammon's bill would require police officers to demand proof of citizenship or  residency from anyone they stop for a traffic violation or other infraction if there is reasonable suspicion the person is in the United States unlawfully. The officer would have to make a reasonable attempt to verify a person's citizenship status, and suspected illegal immigrants could be detained and charged with trespassing.
 
  The bill would require jails to hold people until officers can verify their immigration status. It would make it a crime to house, give a ride to, rent to or employ an illegal immigrant.
 
  Opponents in the Legislature questioned how a police officer would decide who to pursue as a possible illegal immigrant.
 
  "Help me understand this reasonable suspicion. Do I look American?" Rep. Joe Hubbard, D-Montgomery, asked Hammon.
 
  Hammon said that, in his opinion, he thought "reasonable suspicion" could apply to a person without identification acting nervous or changing their story as they talk to the officer, or it could be a car tag that doesn't match the vehicle description.
 
  Other legislators said they were concerned the bill would lead to racial profiling and encourage the targeting of people who don't speak English or may look and sound different.
 
  Hammon said law enforcement officers could only stop a person for a traffic or other offense and could not pull over a person solely based on suspicions about their immigration status.
 
  Rep. Kerry Rich, R-Albertville, said his Sand Mountain district is inundated with illegal immigrants and something needs to be done.
 
  "The illegals in this country are ripping us off," Rich said.
 
  "If we wait for the federal government to put this fire out, our house is going to burn down," Rich said.
 
  The Pew Hispanic Center earlier this year estimated that Alabama may have 120,000 unauthorized immigrants as of March 2010, double the estimate for 2005.
  

California immigration bills die in committee

A legislative committee on Tuesday rejected twin bills by a Republican lawmaker who sought to crack down on illegal immigration in California, in part by requiring citizenship verification for anyone applying for a job or public benefits.
The legislation by Assemblyman Tim Donnelly, a tea party member from San Bernardino County, faced long odds in a Legislature controlled by Democrats.
His main bill, AB26, would have allowed residents to sue so-called "sanctuary cities," which do not cooperate with federal immigration officials, and required employers to verify applicants' citizenship. It was rejected on a party-line, 7-3 vote by the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
It dealt the same fate to a shorter bill, AB1018, which would have required the citizenship check for anyone applying for public benefits.
Assemblyman Brian Jones, who co-authored AB26, said it was not an anti-immigrant bill but rather would have forced local government to comply with federal law.
"You either support the constitution, or you usurp the constitution," said Jones, R-Santee.
But committee chairman Mike Feuer, D-Los Angeles, called the bill unconstitutional and said it was "needlessly divisive." He agreed with business representatives who said it would cost the state jobs and with law enforcement officials who said it would make Californians less safe by diverting resources otherwise used to fight more serious crimes.
Donnelly said his legislation would adopt parts of an Arizona law passed last year and seen as the toughest measure adopted by any state against illegal immigration.
Neither of his bills, however, contained language similar to the most high-profile provision of the Arizona law, which directed law enforcement officers to check the citizenship status of anyone they suspect of being in the country illegally. That stipulation and much of the rest of the law are on hold as it is being contested in federal court.
Some provisions in AB26 would have punished sex traffickers with life in prison and charged illegal immigrants with a felony if caught trespassing on public or private land while in possession of drugs. The bill also discouraged people from picking up day laborers who are in the United States illegally.
Scores of supporters filled the committee room Tuesday, some from the Minuteman Project, which opposes illegal immigration, and at least a dozen wearing tea party shirts. Dozens of others turned out in opposition.
Assemblywoman Alyson Huber, D-Lodi, said she agreed with parts of AB26 but could not vote for all of it. She suggested Donnelly break up the bill into more manageable parts.
"I worry about overselling this bill as the solution to the entire problem," she said.
After the hearing, Donnelly, a state Minuteman founder, suggested he would take Huber's advice.
"I found that very encouraging," he told The Associated Press. "There's room to build support on some of those provisions. Just because we lost in one committee, doesn't mean the problem goes away."


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/04/05/state/n114225D49.DTL#ixzz1IheYRaAZ

Radiation Scare Prompts South Korea Salt Shortage

Stores across South Korea are seeing salt disappear from shelves. Buyers say they want to stock up ahead of possible contamination from radiation in Japan. Others are under the impression that ingesting it offers protection from radioactive iodine.

South Koreans have gone on a salt buying binge. That has prompted the price of salt to nearly double since this time a year ago.

Some are calling it an irrational reaction to the nuclear power plant accident in Japan.

Seoul housewife Lee Jeong-hwa says she heard that sea water could start being affected by radiation from Japan by Wednesday, if not earlier.

Lee says that is why she went out today to buy some salt produced before the nuclear accident. She explains she is trying to get pregnant and does not want to eat contaminated salt.

The branch manager of a Lotte Market in downtown Seoul, Kang Dae-hee, says his store used to sell one or two packs of salt per day.

Kang says recently that has increased to seven or eight packs and, even, sometimes 10 daily. He explains that foreign tourists are coming by frequently and also buying unusual quantities of seaweed products, such as kelp, which also is a source of iodine.

Panic salt buying was reported last month in China. That prompted the government there to launch a crackdown on hoarding and price gouging.

Scientists and authorities express skepticism about such reactions from consumers. They note that radiation, except for the immediate areas surrounding the Fukushima, Japan nuclear facility, is not likely to register at any level of concern to human health. They also say ingesting salt will not protect against radioactive iodine fallout.

Dr. Ahn Young-sil, a professor of nuclear medicine at the Ajou Medical Center in Suwon city, says seaweed and salt products do not contain enough iodine to prevent the thyroid gland from absorbing the amount of radiation that would be spewed from a significant nuclear disaster. And she warns that consuming these products in large quantities could cause other health problems.

The Salt Institute, in the United States, says a person would have to eat more than one-and-a-half kilograms of iodized table salt daily to stop the thyroid from being able to absorb harmful particles.

South Korea’s Institute of Nuclear Safety reports that very small amounts of radioactive iodine and cesium have been detected in the country. It says analysis of air samples taken at 12 locations across the nation Sunday and Monday revealed traces of radioactive iodine in all areas.

The Fukushima-1 nuclear power plant, on Japan’s northeastern coast, was severely damaged by a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and resulting tsunami on March 11. Overheated nuclear fuel rods and steam from the crippled plant have vented radiation into the atmosphere. Meanwhile, radioactive water from the facility has been spilling into the Pacific Ocean. That includes water containing radioactive iodine measured at levels millions of times the legal limit

11-Hour Day Raises Heart Disease Risk By 67% Compared To 8-Hour Day

If you work 11-hours a day average you will probably earn more than your 8-hour a day colleagues, but your risk of developing heart disease will be 67% higher, European researchers reveal in a study published in Annals of Internal Medicine. The researchers believe doctors should include data on a patient's working hours when listing risk factors for heart disease, such as smoking status, total body weight, diabetes, and blood pressure.

Professor Mika Kivimäki, from University College London, and team gathered data on over 10,000 British civil servants since 1985 (Whitehall II Study). 7,095 of them had no symptoms of heart disease, angina and no medical histories of heart disease at the start of the study, they were all full-time working men and women - the researchers focused on these people.

They gathered data on heart disease risk factors, such as cholesterol levels, blood pressure, age, smoking status and diabetes. Participants reported on their daily schedules, including how many hours they worked on an average weekday - including work brought home. 11-year follow up data was gathered and analyzed, including how many had heart attacks and developed other cardiovascular diseases, results of medical screenings which occurred every five years, health records and hospital data.

They found that by adding how many hours an individual generally worked each week to their list of risk factors, it was easier for doctors to predict heart disease risk - a 5% improvement in their prediction rate.

Doctors commonly use the Framingham risk model to determine an individual's risk for developing coronary heart disease over a ten-year period. This risk model includes several factors, including blood pressure, smoking status, lipid levels, etc., but no psychological factors, such as workplace stress.

Kivimäki said:

"We have shown that working long days is associated with a remarkable increase in risk of heart disease. Considering that including a measurement of working hours in a GP interview is so simple and useful, our research presents a strong case that it should become standard practice. This new information should help improve decisions regarding medication for heart disease. It could also be a wake-up call for people who overwork themselves, especially if they already have other risk factors."